Promotions
Promotions at ITAC are earned, not granted by tenure. Moving up from Class II to Class III to Class IV reflects what you can actually do across technical, leadership, and professional competencies. Finishing Class III also lines up with eligibility for the DOE Certificate of Participation.
How to Apply
Promotions are self-initiated. When you think you are performing at the next class level across the competencies below, submit a promotion application using the Airtable promotion form. Your application is reviewed by the center director and senior staff.
You can apply at any time. There is no fixed promotion cycle.
What Your Application Must Include
For each competency you are claiming at the next level, your form response needs to include:
-
Specific evidence. Concrete examples of work you have actually done that show the level. Vague claims like "I write good reports" do not count. Specific references like "I wrote the compressed air leak survey recommendation for the Acme assessment, and it went to the client with no substantive edits" do count.
-
Attached artifacts. At the end of the form, attach the specific deliverables you reference. For example, if you cite a recommendation as evidence of analysis software use, attach that recommendation only, not the full report. Keep artifacts targeted to the claim you are making.
Handling a Below-Level Competency
Within a single category (Technical Competencies, Leadership & Collaboration, Knowledge & Development, or Professionalism), you can be performing below the required level in one competency and still be eligible for promotion in that category, as long as you exceed expectations in a different competency in the same category.
If this applies to you, note it explicitly in your Airtable response. Identify the competency where you fall short, identify the competency where you exceed, and explain how the latter makes up for the former.
This exception applies per category. You cannot offset a Technical shortfall with a Leadership & Collaboration strength. This does not apply for Professionalism. You have to meet all professionalism criteria to be eligible for a promotion.
Responsibility Matrix
The matrix below lays out expectations at each class. Class III completion lines up with DOE Certificate of Participation eligibility, and the rightmost column maps each competency to its DOE core skill.
Technical Competencies
| Competency | Class II | Class III | Class IV | DOE Skill Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment Recommendation Identification | Identifies standard ARs from checklists with guidance; recognizes common energy waste patterns | Independently identifies ARs during site visits; recognizes nonstandard opportunities; contributes to AR scoping | Identifies complex or novel ARs; leads AR scoping for full assessments; trains others in identification methodology | 1) Assessment Recommendation Identification |
| Energy Savings Calculations | Performs standard calculations using existing templates; guided troubleshooting of errors | Develops full calculations independently using engineering fundamentals; checks and validates others' work | Designs new calculation models for nonstandard problems; develops or refines calculation templates | 3) Energy Savings Calculations |
| Report Writing | Drafts recommendation content under guidance; needs substantive edits for clarity and accuracy | Writes full recommendation sections with minimal edits; produces client-ready narrative and technical detail | Drafts complete client-ready recommendation documents; mentors others in technical writing standards | 2) Report Writing |
| Utility Data Analysis | Reads utility bills and enters data into templates; performs basic consumption and cost analysis with guidance | Independently analyzes utility data to identify trends, anomalies, and baseline conditions; contextualizes findings for ARs | Develops analytical methods for complex rate structures or multi-facility comparisons; trains others in utility analysis | 6) Utility Data Analysis |
| Conceptual AR Designs | Understands basic AR design logic (e.g., equipment sizing, setpoint adjustments) with supervision | Independently develops conceptual designs for standard ARs, including system configurations and operating parameters | Designs solutions for complex or novel ARs; integrates multiple systems into cohesive recommendations | 7) Conceptual Assessment Recommendation Designs |
| Analysis Software Use (Excel, SAM, etc.) | Performs basic analysis with provided tools and templates | Independently modifies tools and templates for specific assessment conditions; troubleshoots tool errors | Develops new analysis methods, software scripts, or modeling tools for the center | Supports multiple DOE skills |
Leadership & Collaboration
| Competency | Class II | Class III | Class IV | DOE Skill Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client Interaction | Observes client meetings; asks clarifying questions when prompted | Speaks in client meetings about assigned areas; presents data and recommendations clearly | Leads sections of client presentations; manages ongoing client relationships; handles difficult conversations | 5) Client Interaction |
| Teamwork and Group Interaction | Works cooperatively within assigned teams; communicates task status to leads | Actively supports team coordination; fills gaps during assessments; facilitates peer collaboration | Shapes team culture and norms; resolves interpersonal friction; models constructive collaboration | 4) ITAC Teamwork/Group Interaction |
| Site Leadership | Follows team leads' direction; does not lead teams | Leads small sections of field work or analysis tasks; delegates effectively within scope | Manages full site teams; assigns tasks based on team capabilities; makes real-time judgment calls during assessments | 8) Leadership |
| Mentorship and Training | N/A | Supports onboarding new hires; answers procedural and technical questions | Trains and mentors junior students; designs and runs training sessions; contributes to curriculum development | 8) Leadership |
Knowledge & Development
| Competency | Class II | Class III | Class IV | DOE Skill Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Research | Supports with background research for recommendations | Independently researches and summarizes technical options; evaluates vendor claims and product specifications | Researches and proposes new technical offerings for ITAC; contributes to center knowledge base | Supports multiple DOE skills |
| Special Projects | Participates in team projects under close supervision | Takes ownership of a defined section of a special project; delivers on time with minimal oversight | Independently leads and delivers special projects from scoping through completion | Supports multiple DOE skills |
Professionalism
| Competency | Class II | Class III | Class IV | DOE Skill Alignment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Communication and Responsiveness | Responds to messages and emails within a reasonable timeframe; communicates basic status updates when asked | Proactively communicates progress, blockers, and schedule changes; writes clear and professional messages to team and clients | Models professional communication norms for the team; manages multi-stakeholder communication during assessments | Crosscutting |
| Reliability and Accountability | Attends scheduled activities; completes assigned tasks with reminders | Consistently meets deadlines without prompting; takes ownership of deliverables; acknowledges and corrects mistakes promptly | Tracks and manages complex deliverables across multiple assessments; holds others accountable constructively | Crosscutting |
| Safety and Site Conduct | Follows PPE requirements and safety briefings; behaves appropriately on client sites | Anticipates safety considerations during assessment planning; ensures team compliance; represents ITAC professionally to host facilities | Leads safety briefings; identifies and mitigates site-specific risks; sets team expectations for professional site conduct | Crosscutting |
| Intellectual Curiosity and Initiative | Asks questions and seeks to understand assessment context beyond immediate tasks | Independently deepens technical knowledge; identifies process improvements; volunteers for challenging work | Drives innovation in center practices; proposes and executes improvements to tools, methods, or training | Crosscutting |